Why generic AI tools aren’t enough
What any LLM gives you
- Generic document summary without regulatory context
- No mapping to your specific Article 26 obligations
- No comparative benchmarks against other vendors
- No legal standing as evidence of due diligence
- No bridge from vendor evaluation to FRIA
What TwinLadder gives you
- Contextual evaluation for YOUR organisation, jurisdiction, team
- Every finding mapped to specific Article 26 deployer obligations
- Comparative benchmarks — percentile scoring across vendor database
- Article 26 Compliance Report designed as regulatory evidence
- Vendor evaluation data pre-populates 30–40% of your FRIA
We give away the methodology. The TwinLadder Standard is CC BY-SA 4.0 — open.
Read about the StandardHow it works
1
Register Your AI Tools
Add vendors to your registry with risk classification and Annex III category mapping.
2
Evaluate & Score
AI-assisted analysis mapped to 7 TwinLadder Standard pillars. Send structured RFI to vendors. Review responses.
3
Get Your Report
Article 26 Compliance Report — structured evidence of deployer due diligence.
Article 26 requires you to evaluate your AI vendors. Can you prove it?
As a deployer of high-risk AI systems, you have specific obligations under Article 26 of the EU AI Act — including vendor oversight, risk documentation, and ongoing monitoring. TwinLadder gives you the structured process to meet them.